Institutional shopping for natural resource management in a protected area and indigenous territory in the Bolivian Amazon
Protected area or indigenous territory? Where multiple and sometimes conflicting institutions exist, indigenous people in the Bolivian Amazon have to continuously negotiate access to resources.
For indigenous people it is often difficult if an area where they have
lived in or used resources becomes protected. Even if they are allowed to
still access some resources, the modalities of this use have to be
negotiated continuously. Research in the Bolivian lowlands shows that
where multiple sets of rules and regulations (institutions) exist,
indigenous people situation-dependently choose rules through
'institutional shopping' to maintain access to resources. This knowledge
can be used to build robust institutions for protected areas from the
bottom up that are better adapted to the local context.
More news
- Melting glaciers causing sea levels to rise at ever greater rates
- Do financial incentives motivate farmers to conserve land?
- How landscapes contribute to our well-being
- Ice-sheet growing from the base
- Charcoal: Major Missing Piece in the Global Carbon Cycle
- Extracting mobility patterns from Call Detail Records
- Mapping functional diversity of forests with remote sensing
- Unaccompanied minor asylum seekers - feelings of belonging in educational experiences
- The effect of anxiety and spatial abilities in route learning from maps
- Making Concessions at the Mining Frontier in Burkina Faso
- New method for analyzing tracking data enables better understanding of behavioral patterns of animals
- Who is responsible for negative effects of anthropogenic climate change?
- Glaciers in the Karakoram Mountains are in balance since the 1970s
- The mega-event syndrome
- Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century
- Variability and evolution of global land surface phenology
- A literature-based estimation of fire-derived organic matter in soils
- Neoliberal austerity and the marketisation of elderly care