The emotional entanglements of smartphones in the field
Smartphones as data collection instruments cause emotions. This was one of the results of the interdisciplinary project "Youth@Night". The effect of such emotions calls for a renewed scrutiny of research ethics, particularly as smartphones increasingly become part of research designs.
-
- Image: Pixabay
One of our study tasks asked participants to use the app designed for the study to take 10‐second video clips of every new place they attended at nights out. They were instructed to record a panorama by slowly turning from left to right with their smartphone. In the following, Lynn, explained why she avoided collecting video clips in private spaces:
"At friends' places, I felt like blocked from making videos. Photos were ok, they are fast taken, I don't need two hours, but with videos I needed to turn (the camera). Then people look at you like what are you doing, you are at my place, why are you filming? So I felt uncomfortable. I thought it disrespectful-Well, I would have had to ask (for permission to film). This is why I decided to make no videos (in private spaces)."
Others explained:
"I tried to avoid filming people"(Les),"I think I ensured that I didn't include any faces in my recordings"(Vivien),"I think I tried to film the ceiling (only)"(Sam).
All this quotes stem from interviews we did in the course of the interdisciplinary SNSF research project "youth@night". In the project we designed and used a smartphone application to collect data on young people's nightlife practices in Lausanne and Zurich. With 40 of the participants who used the app for several nights, we did in-depth interviews to understand what it means for them to use their smartphones to collect data.
We found that smartphone cameras are sticky with distrust when their application is not self‐evidently personal (e.g., for selfies) or even obviously used to collect photographs and videos. This raises the question of how to address participants' feelings when they collect data on behalf of absent researchers. A situation also given in citizen science projects. In answering this question, we draw on the "responsible view" of the research participants, we witnessed in our research. Drawing from this study, we advocate making time and space during data collection for researchers and research participants - also in citizen science projects - to develop a responsible gaze with smartphones as an ethical research practice.
Truong, J., Labhart, F., Santani, D., Gatica-Perez, D., Kuntsche, E., Landolt, S. (2019). The emotional entanglements of smartphones in the field: On emotional discomfort, power relations, and research ethics. Area 2019; 00:1-8.
More news
- Grassland ecosystems become more resilient with age
- Which glaciers are the largest in the world?
- Unlocking Environmental Narratives
- Relationships to nature go both ways – care and attention for nature bring satisfaction and joy for Swiss Alpine farmers
- «Ober mal wett hürate?» oder die Geographie der Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik
- Diverse forests outyield monocultures
- Drought-exposure history improves recovery of grassland communities from subsequent drought
- Satellite monitoring of biodiversity moves within reach
- Gone with the wind? How small birds move to the wintering grounds
- Choose your own route!
- Improving soil health in tropical regions
- Climate and soil determine distribution of plant traits
- Getting the big picture of biodiversity
- Capturing mood and affective states via Twitter
- What If Our History Was Written In Our Grammar?
- Can large volcanic eruptions make glaciers great again?
- New model simulates the tsunamis caused by iceberg calving
- Deep forest soils produce greenhouse gases as temperatures climb
- Global glacier retreat has accelerated
- 1918 Pandemic Second Wave Had Fatal Consequences
- Earlier than expected
- Locked-in and living delta pathways in the Anthropocene
- Staying home for nightlife
- Directed Species Loss from Species-Rich Forests Strongly Decreases Productivity
- Daily Mobility for Healthy Aging
- Water Towers of the world ranked on vulnerability
- Himalayan lakes are exacerbating glacial melt
- Gaming for better data
- Poor communication torpedoes a second national park
- Black mystery in the Amazon River
- Find your way back with intelligent navigation systems
- From fires to oceans
- Ice on a stick in soil research
- Melting glaciers causing sea levels to rise at ever greater rates
- Do financial incentives motivate farmers to conserve land?
- How landscapes contribute to our well-being
- Ice-sheet growing from the base
- Charcoal: Major Missing Piece in the Global Carbon Cycle
- Extracting mobility patterns from Call Detail Records
- Mapping functional diversity of forests with remote sensing
- Unaccompanied minor asylum seekers - feelings of belonging in educational experiences
- The effect of anxiety and spatial abilities in route learning from maps
- Making Concessions at the Mining Frontier in Burkina Faso
- New method for analyzing tracking data enables better understanding of behavioral patterns of animals
- Who is responsible for negative effects of anthropogenic climate change?
- Glaciers in the Karakoram Mountains are in balance since the 1970s
- The mega-event syndrome
- Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century
- Variability and evolution of global land surface phenology
- A literature-based estimation of fire-derived organic matter in soils
- Neoliberal austerity and the marketisation of elderly care
- Institutional shopping for natural resource management in a protected area and indigenous territory in the Bolivian Amazon