#47: Is there a place for people in protected areas?
National parks aim to protect nature. But different claims to natural resource use often clash and create tensions. GIUZ researchers want to better understand how human-nature relationships influence the different opinions about national parks.
-
- Visitors to the Swiss National Park observe an area where a forest fire burned in the 1950's without human intervention to control it. Nowadays forest fires would be extinguished in the park, since almost all fires are caused by humans. (photo: Mollie Chapman)
Everyone loves a national park, right?
Pristine landscapes to enjoy while hiking, inspiring animal observations, solitude and calm…. Images we often connect to national parks. Not only are national parks favorite tourist destinations, they are also widely regarded to be one of the most successful measures for the conservation of biodiversity.
Well, not always….
Despite these positive attributes, local populations living in and around national parks and other protected areas often raise critical voices. Protected areas restrict traditional activities or ways of relating to and engaging with nature that local people enjoy. Different opinions and different claims to natural resource use often clash and create tensions. In our research, we want to better understand how human-nature relationships influence these different opinions about national parks.
-
- Restoration of a drywall on Alp Ampervreila, in the proposed buffer zone of Parc Adula (photo: Annina Michel)
Do parks and local people have the same understanding of human-nature relationships?
The Swiss National Park employs one of the highest levels of nature protection. As well as bans on any kind of extractive use, the park also uses a hands off approach to ecosystem management. Park rangers seek to influence nature as little as possible. Tourists are also asked to minimize their impact on the park, sticking to clearly marked trails and rest areas.
This model of strict human/nature separation is in stark contrast to the ways that many farmers in the area understand their relationship with nature--in which people and nature work closely together. Farmers in the area carefully manage the grazing and fertilization of their pastures, creating some pastures for more productive use and focusing on biodiversity protection in others. The park's approach, in contrast, allows local deer populations to graze unhindered by hunters or predators, leading to a higher level of grazing than most farmers would use on their lands.
Why do people reject new national parks?
The diverse relationships people have with nature also influence how involved and affected people perceive justice and injustice in national park negotiations. In late 2016, local residents in 17 municipalities in south-eastern Switzerland rejected a new national park project at the ballots. This new park project, called Parc Adula, was meant to be the first national park of the “new generation”. Compared to the existing Swiss National Park, the new national park concept is less restrictive and focuses more strongly on cultural and economic benefits.
-
- vote on Parc Adula
- Results of the popular vote on Parc Adula in November 2016 (map by Annina Michel, @geodata: Swiss Parks Network, swisstopo; voting data by municipalities).
Discussions surrounding the project got very emotional. Manifold values influence the perception of what is just or unjust. These—often competing—senses of (in-)justice posed a big challenge for the project promoters. What some people regard as just, other perceive as unjust. Even though the park project was based on a bottom-up initiative, locals feared the influence of outsiders and trust issues exacerbated the planning process.
Protecting nature by understanding people
These research projects show us that the idea of separating people and nature does not fit with many people’s worldviews. However, many examples show that people—and not only nature—can benefit from national parks in different ways. By following an equitable management that is carried out by local persons, national parks can serve as innovative tools for economic growth and cultural engagement, as well as places of scientific interest.
Whereas we looked at two examples from Switzerland where direct democracy ensures a certain level of equitable protected area planning and management, other countries face more challenging socio-economic circumstances. Nevertheless, discourses surrounding protected areas are often very similar. When new protected areas are proposed or existing ones make decisions about their management, it is important that they consider the local socio-cultural context. How do the different people in the region relate to nature and how might a protected area align or misalign with this understanding? Will the creation or management of the protected area be perceived as unjust by some local actors? Understanding how a protected area is perceived by and impacts the people around and in it will help to manage protected areas in a more accepted and ultimately more successful way. Many conservation groups and governing bodies around the world seek to employ this more integrated 'people and nature' approach to protected areas.
Links
Publications
Michel, Annina Helena; Backhaus, Norman (2019). Unravelling reasons for the non-establishment of protected areas: justification regimes and principles of worth in a Swiss national park project. Environmental Values, 28(2):171-190.
Michel, Annina Helena (2019). How conceptions of equity and justice shape national park negotiations: The case of Parc Adula, Switzerland. Eco.mont, 11(1):25-31.
Projects on human-nature relations around the Swiss national Park (in progress, unpublished)
Related work on different conceptions of nature
Chapman, Mollie; Satterfield, Terre; Chan, Kai MA (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?.Land Use Policy, 82:464-475.
Chan, K. M. A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M.,Díaz, S., Gómez-Baggethun, E., et al. (2016). Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(6), 1462–1465.
Weitere News
- #125: Der 125. und letzte
- #124: Gletscher vor 125 Jahren und heute
- #123: Ist das Navi in der Hand der erste Schritt zum betreuten Wohnen?
- #122: In eine neue Welt katapultiert
- #121: How to make health care service provision more equitable and greener
- #120: Unsere Welt ist eine multidimensionale Collage
- #119: Is Tourism the Beginning or the End? Livelihoods of Georgian Mountain People at Stake
- #118: «Wir müssen den Klimawandel systematisch als Risiko mitdenken»
- #117: Andean mountain regions: Fragile sentinels of landscape and cultural transformation
- #116: Temporary streams at the doorsteps of Irchel Campus
- #115: Schneeflocken vom Weltraum aus zählen
- #114: Provokation und Revolte am GIUZ
- #113: Ambitious goals for biodiversity urgently needed!
- #112: "The Eyes Have It!" - Where we look while navigating
- #111: Investigating plants genetic structure from above
- #110: «I see and I remember. I do and I understand.»
- #109: «Für uns, unsere Kinder und Kindeskinder»
- #108: Was macht die Digitalisierung mit unserer Umwelt?
- #107: The role of a developer at GIUZ
- #106: Dem unterirdischen Wasser auf der Spur
- #105: Was der Geographieunterricht zur Bildung im 21. Jahrhundert beitragen kann
- #104: Nepal - Kein Land für alte Leute?
- #103: Klimawandel in der Schweiz: Alles, was du wissen musst!
- #102: Wie Instagram unseren Umgang mit der Natur verändert
- #101: Numbed by navigation technologies: How can we counteract?
- #100: Das ist der 100. Blogbeitrag
- #99: Investigating food sustainability: from production and trade to consumption
- #98: Geographers live in concert - postponed!
- #97: Global Glyphosate: Uneven Geographies of herbicide production and use
- #96: "Pesticides burned grass and know-how"
- #95: Vier Standorte in 125 Jahren
- #94: Dietikon: Vom Bauerndorf zur Stadt
- #93: What is biodiversity?
- #92: Feldarbeit im ruralen Nepal: Reflektion zu Positionalität, Verantwortung und Rollen
- #91: Das Schulfach Geographie: heute und morgen
- #90: Funktionale Diversität aus dem Weltraum kartieren
- #89: Adieu ewig’ Eis
- #88: Landschaftsleistungen erlebbar machen
- #87: What is the role of variability in nature?
- #86: The Skin of Chitwan
- #85: Animated flight line collection over Switzerland
- #84: Space, Nature & Society: Wo wir forschen und was wir tun
- #83: Do you know about the 3MT competition?
- #82: An academic career in ecology
- #81: Hunderte Studierende verzaubern den Semesterstart an der Uni Zürich
- #80: Wie bewegen wir uns in Zukunft fort?
- #79: Willkommen im GEO- und ESS-Studium!
- #78: Expedition vom Fenster aus: Wie nimmst du deine Umgebung wahr?
- #77: Mitten in der Pandemie eine historische Pandemie untersuchen
- #76: Das Geoteam stellt sich vor
- #75: How roots influence climate change
- #74: Imaging the earth from above
- #73: Studierende sammeln Daten: Natur, Landschaft und Ressourcen
- #72: Trouvaillen aus dem Archiv
- #71: The fluorescence of phytoplankton from 800 km above
- #70: Der kalte Norden ist auch familiär
- #69: How the COVID-19 pandemic is teaching us to tackle the climate crisis
- #68: Studierende sammeln Daten: Migration, Mobilität und Stadt
- #67: Sommerpause!
- #66: On the art of failing forward
- #65: Die Wasserstadt Zürich mit dem Smartphone entdecken
- #64: Auf den Spuren der ersten Schweizer Polarforscher
- #63: Geistreiche Wortspiele
- #62: Von Gemüse über Milch bis zu Kaffee: Solawis in der Deutschschweiz
- #61: Berner Seeland - quo vadis?
- #60: Intense days on the field course to Val Piora
- #59: Panta rhei - alles fliesst
- #58: Comic Strip Geographies
- #57: Where we come from
- #56: A journey through time with loess deposits
- #55: Schlacht am Morgarten 1315: Wie sah die Landschaft damals aus?
- #54: Berne going green
- #53: Biochar increases rice root architecture
- #52: Velo- und Fussverkehr in der Corona-Zeit
- #51: The impact of Covid-19 from an economic geography perspective
- #50: Why do we create virtual forests?
- #49: Wenn das Eis fehlt: Das Lötschental und seine Zukunft
- #48: Wie Skitouren geplant werden: Big Data gibt Einblicke
- #46: Artenvielfalt im Irchelpark
- #45: Cress, tomatoes and the meaning of the universe
- #44: Scientific games to understand social-ecological system dynamics
- #43: Insight into the WGMS
- #42: Connecting female hydrologists worldwide: an initiative born at GIUZ
- #41: Maximilian schickt dich einkaufen
- #40: Sars-CoV-2 and food producers: who cares?
- #39: The value of water
- #38: Mit Slimy-Masse die Gletscherschmelze illustrieren
- #37: Was machen Geographinnen und Geographen nach dem Studium?
- #36: Geographie-Student Jonathan, der Erdball und die CO2-Männli
- #35: Zwei Studiengänge am Geographischen Institut
- #34: Urban Sustainability as New Financial Fix?
- #33: Stillschweigend im Verborgenen
- #32: Interaktiv und interdisziplinär
- #31: Unpacking the complexity of social-ecological systems
- #30: Der Landschaft lauschen
- #29: Synergien zwischen Homeschooling und Hochschullehre schaffen
- #28: The first fully remote PhD defenses
- #27: Der Weltwassertag fällt ins Wasser
- #26: Die GIUZ Sustainability Task Force
- #25: Was ist Geographie?
- #24: «Geografe nüme schlafe!»
- #23: Auf dem Weg zur 2000-Watt-Gesellschaft
- #22: Spatial genetics for plant-based communities - and much more!
- #21: Strebergärtli - Irchel Garden Project
- #20: Writing papers - a nightmare. Or not?
- #19: Urbanisierte Landschaften - Leben zwischen Natur und Zivilisation
- #18: Atmende Wälder in 3D
- #17: «Wir sind hier, wir sind laut!»
- #16: Was ist EGEA?
- #15: Exploring the future of biodiversity
- #14: Lawinenbulletins in den Alpen: Konsistenz über die Landesgrenzen hinweg
- #13: Ein Kaffee aus der Eiszeit
- #12: Grönland 1912 - und heute!
- #11: «Wir sitzen alle im selben Boot»
- #10: Monitoring und Reduktion von Flugreisen am GIUZ
- #9: Der Verein Geographie Alumni UZH: Ein Forum für alle Geographieinteressierten
- #8: Wissen in Bildern - Informationsdesign heute
- #7: Geographie in Aufruhr
- #6: Gletschermessreihen mit Mayonnaise
- #5: Landkarten im Reduit
- #4: Die Plastiksuppe kartieren
- #3: Neue Abteilung «Space, Nature and Society»
- #2: Wie alles begann
- #1: Alles Gute zum 125. Geburtstag